Fathers would possibly not need to hear that their testosterone levels are dropping, but new research bears that out, finding that the male hormone plummets in men once they have children — most dramatically in dads who really involve themselves within the nitty-gritty of kid rearing.
The findings suggest that ladies aren’t the one ones who’re biologically geared for raising children. Plunging testosterone may also help a person decide to his family and reinforce his do something about caregiving, amping up his sensitivity to his children’s needs. “If this weren’t something that were normative in humans for the last 100,000 or more years, there could be no reason to expect this decline in testosterone,” says lead author Lee Gettler, a biological anthropologist and doctoral candidate in Northwestern’s Department of Anthropology.
This is not the first time that declines in testosterone has been associated with fatherhood, but previous research involved small samples observed during brief “snapshots” in time, making it impossible to divine the solution to this conundrum: does fatherhood itself cause testosterone to plummet, or are men with lower testosterone likely to become fathers?
Researchers at Northwestern University got down to collect data through the years to shed some light at the issue. They retrieved testosterone via saliva samples from 465 Filipino men after they were 21 and single, then repeated the similar tests when the lads were 26. The boys — who gave samples the very first thing within the morning, when testosterone levels are highest, and again within the evening, after they’d declined — were a part of a 28-year project that has followed the similar cohort since they were within the womb.
In the five years between study segments, one of the vital men remained single, others found partners but remained childless, while still others had gone directly to have children. The only men experienced a modest decline in testosterone (the hormone naturally declines with age), while the fathers notched a dramatic nosedive — twice up to their single counterparts, in keeping with the research, which was published Monday within the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS). The lads who had partners but no kids fell somewhere between the opposite two groups.
MORE: Guys Are Right: Size Matters, With regards to Fertility
But what’s really interesting is how taking an active role in child-rearing looked as if it would have an especially chilling effect on a man’s testosterone. Researchers asked fathers about their involvement within the day-to-day duties of kid care — activities reminiscent of fidgeting with their kids, taking them for walks or on errands, watching television with them and feeding and bathing them — and located that folks that reported spending greater than three hours an afternoon tending to their kids had the bottom levels of testosterone of the entire groups.
“It really seems that the level to which fathers finally end up with low testosterone is predicated on how actively they take part in child care,” says Gettler. “IT IS NOT just that after men become fathers, their testosterone goes down. But if they feed and bathe and play with them, it goes down substantially more. This appears to be an evolved trait, fathers taking good care of their young.”
Interpreting the finding within an evolutionary framework, it signifies that men are apparently hard-wired to reply biologically to fatherhood. It’s a fresh perspective, for the reason that the traditional wisdom describes traditional societies as those by which men are hunter-gatherers, while women at the home front forage for berries and handle kids.
In species wherein fathers typically pitch in to handle offspring — birds are a chief example — scientists have documented similarly high testosterone levels in mating males that subsequently decline as they assist raise their chicks.
It’s simply a part of human evolution, says Gettler. Women, within the years, have needed help caring for children; men have answered the decision. “Humans do not have been as successful if fathers weren’t helping,” says Gettler.
MORE: Chore Duty: Do Fathers Still Have It Easier Than Mothers?
Of course, as in any academic discipline, not everyone agrees. Many researchers hew to more traditional evolutionary view that females did the lion’s share of child-rearing — aunts, sisters and grandmothers. Or even Gettler is quick to show that he is not suggesting fathers were the one people helping Mama.
“It’s an ongoing debate in anthropology,” says Gettler. “But that is suggestive that taking care of children is a job fathers were playing in human evolution to the level that it has become embedded in human male physiology.”
Perhaps cultural dynamics could also be at work, says Robin Simon, a sociology professor at Wake Forest University who studies gender and parenthood, among other things. “I AM NOT conversant in the gendered context of parenting within the Ph…